howmuchsun

Solar panel angle in Reykjavík

In Reykjavík, fixed panels collect the most energy over a year tilted 49° from horizontal and facing south. But anything between 40° and 60° is within 2% of the best, so the pitch you already have is probably fine.

What is your roof worth?

Of the maximum 96% facing south, 30° pitch
Best here 49° facing south
Good-enough range 40–60° within 2% of the maximum

Every roof, scored

Percentage of the maximum possible annual yield, for each combination of orientation and pitch in Reykjavík.

Percentage of maximum annual yield by roof orientation (rows) and pitch (columns).
Roof faces 15° 30° 45° 60° 90°
South 74% 87% 96% 100% 98% 80%
South-east / south-west 74% 83% 89% 91% 89% 73%
East / west 74% 73% 71% 69% 66% 54%
North-east / north-west 74% 63% 52% 44% 40% 33%
North 74% 59% 44% 32% 27% 23%

Why "tilt equals your latitude" is wrong here

The rule of thumb says tilt your panels at your latitude — 64° for Reykjavík. The real optimum is 49°, 15° lower than the rule suggests.

Two reasons, both geometric. Summer days are much longer than winter ones, so the year's energy is weighted toward a higher sun than the annual average. And a low winter sun sends its light through a long slant of atmosphere, arriving weak — tilting to catch it costs more in summer than it wins in winter.

In fairness to the rule: following it here would cost you only 3.0%. It is wrong, but it is not expensive.

Seasonal angles

If you can adjust your panels twice a year, these are the angles to use. Most people should not bother — the gain is small and the ladder is real.

SettingTiltFacing
Fixed, all year49°south
Summer34°south
Winter81°south
Flat on the ground

A flat installation here keeps 74% of the maximum; mounted vertically on a wall, 80%.

Assumptions

  • These are angles and percentages, never kilowatt-hours. Optimal angles are driven by geometry and are robust. Absolute energy output depends on measured irradiance, cloud, soiling and hardware, none of which are modelled here.
  • Clear sky, no shading. Trees, chimneys, neighbouring buildings and terrain are ignored, and they can dominate everything on this page.
  • Fixed panels. Trackers follow the sun and change the answer entirely.
  • Ordinary ground. Reflectance is taken as 0.2, typical for grass and soil. Snow reflects far more and favours steeper tilts.

Full methodology, sources and known limitations