howmuchsun

Solar panel angle in Winston-Salem

In Winston-Salem, fixed panels collect the most energy over a year tilted 32° from horizontal and facing south. But anything between 20° and 40° is within 2% of the best, so the pitch you already have is probably fine.

What is your roof worth?

Of the maximum 100% facing south, 30° pitch
Best here 32° facing south
Good-enough range 20–40° within 2% of the maximum

Every roof, scored

Percentage of the maximum possible annual yield, for each combination of orientation and pitch in Winston-Salem.

Percentage of maximum annual yield by roof orientation (rows) and pitch (columns).
Roof faces 15° 30° 45° 60° 90°
South 88% 97% 100% 98% 90% 62%
South-east / south-west 88% 94% 95% 91% 84% 61%
East / west 88% 86% 81% 75% 67% 49%
North-east / north-west 88% 78% 65% 53% 43% 30%
North 88% 74% 58% 43% 30% 19%

Why "tilt equals your latitude" is wrong here

The rule of thumb says tilt your panels at your latitude — 36° for Winston-Salem. The real optimum is 32°, 4° lower than the rule suggests.

Two reasons, both geometric. Summer days are much longer than winter ones, so the year's energy is weighted toward a higher sun than the annual average. And a low winter sun sends its light through a long slant of atmosphere, arriving weak — tilting to catch it costs more in summer than it wins in winter.

In fairness to the rule: following it here would cost you only 0.3%. It is wrong, but it is not expensive.

Seasonal angles

If you can adjust your panels twice a year, these are the angles to use. Most people should not bother — the gain is small and the ladder is real.

SettingTiltFacing
Fixed, all year32°south
Summersouth
Winter58°south
Flat on the ground

A flat installation here keeps 88% of the maximum; mounted vertically on a wall, 62%.

Other cities in United States

Assumptions

  • These are angles and percentages, never kilowatt-hours. Optimal angles are driven by geometry and are robust. Absolute energy output depends on measured irradiance, cloud, soiling and hardware, none of which are modelled here.
  • Clear sky, no shading. Trees, chimneys, neighbouring buildings and terrain are ignored, and they can dominate everything on this page.
  • Fixed panels. Trackers follow the sun and change the answer entirely.
  • Ordinary ground. Reflectance is taken as 0.2, typical for grass and soil. Snow reflects far more and favours steeper tilts.

Full methodology, sources and known limitations